He
may have only supported the stance of the Catholic Church, which reigns
over Italian life, but when opera singer Andrea Bocelli said he thanked
his mother for not having an abortion while pregnant with him, we could
not help but think that the world should be grateful for having him
around to sing with that beautiful voice.
Bocelli may not be able
to stop wars between nations or find the cure for cancer but his
beautiful tenor is certainly a gift to the world, as his millions of
fans would tell you.
High-minded critics may have frowned upon his lack of technique and poor phrasing. This is what New
York
Times classical music critic Anthony Tomassini said of his show at the
Detroit Opera House, “His sustained notes wobble and his soft high notes
are painfully weak.”
But ask his fans and they will disagree.
They certainly like him — if his multi-platinum records and sold-out
gigs are anything to go by.
Considered as one of the biggest crossover success, Bocelli has recorded 13 studio albums of both
pop and classical music, two greatest hits albums, and eight complete operas, selling over 70 million copies worldwide.
As
an indication of his appeal to the masses, in 1998, Bocelli was named
one of People magazine’s 50 most beautiful people. His name was even put
on a plaque of the Hollywood Walk of Fame, as a mark of appreciation
for his contribution to live theater in March 2010.
Surely 70 million people can’t be wrong.
His
legion of fans also proves that it is almost futile to consider music
or genres in music as always tied to material wealth, or that there is a
direct correlation between socio-economic status and cultural
expression.
It would be easy to conclude that seeing Bocelli’s
live performance at the Grand Ballroom of Ritz-Carlton Hotel over the
weekend, with the attendance of some of the city’s crème de la crème,
ministers and high-ranking government officials as well as the super
rich, is indeed a proof of such correlation, that the adoption of
certain musical genres follows one’s socio-economic standing in society.
But
the chauffeured and the well-heeled Bocelli fans make up only a tiny
percentage of his 70 million-plus fans. The majority of his fans are
probably just college students or office workers who can’t stand rock
and roll but find it difficult to digest lengthy and serious opera.
And
for the latter type of music fans, Bocelli represents what French
sociologist Pierre Bourdieu calls “cultural capital”. Bourdieu’s
“cultural capital” refers to the appropriation of aesthetic alternatives
in which some choices are more highly valued than others and that such
an adoption has little or nothing
to do with the ownership of material wealth.
More than 3,000 ardent fans of Bocelli who flocked the concert venue certainly valued the tenor
of this visually impaired tenor singer more than any other performers in the genre or in the music scene in general.
These
Bocelli devotees had no problems sending thundering applause and a
standing ovation over and over for the rendition of “Amor ti Vieta”,
“Meco All’Atar di Venere” or “O Mio Babbino Caro”.
And dissecting
the technical side of Bocelli’s performance and the impressive work of
his backing orchestra and choir would be superfluous as the flawless
performance itself was certainly soul-stirring, a fitting reminder that
certain forms of art, when performed by the right performers can speak
directly to the heart and soul of man.
Seeing Bocelli’s performance, its aural and visual spectacle, something that an opera in general
should
deliver, certainly reminded the audience why all those high-profile
politicians and businessmen attended his concert in the first place.
There
is a certain air of heaviness with which Bocelli and all opera
performers carry their tunes, whether or not they sing about Greek or
Shakespearian tragedy or just a plain unrequited love song. Such a
performance requires the audience to pour their hearts into the story or
whatever emotions being promoted by the performers on stage.
Those
politicians and businessmen certainly have stepped into the dark
corners of human lives in their pursuit of money and power, and opera no
doubt helps provide a kind of grandiose soundtrack to their travails.
It is said that Napoleon Bonaparte was a big fan of opera and that he attended the majority of performances in all seasons.
But many have said his seeming love of opera may have stemmed from his need for love and approval.
Not
only did he always arrive late, but once he was there, what went on
stage had to stop and everybody had to applaud him. This in a way made
him part of the opera.
Napoleon in his unique way has outdone all aristocrats before him who flaunt opera as a symbol of wealth and prestige.
He made it the symbol of his power.
The night Bocelli performed, everyone in the audience wanted to be with Napoleon.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar